APPLICATIONS

14 Budworth Walk, Wilmslow, Cheshire East, SK9 2HS

26/3278/FUL

Partially retrospective erection of single storey rear extension and conversion of dwelling to 6 bed HMO.

Full details of each application can be found here:

Cheshire East | pa.cheshireeast.gov.uk | Search Planning Applications

Enter the Planning Application Reference Number e.g. 26/4399M. Scroll down to see the detail.

PLANNING DECISIONS

2 Kennerleys Lane, Wilmslow, Cheshire East, SK9 5EQ

26/3178/HOUS

Single storey extension to rear of dwelling.

Approved With Conditions

4 Broad Walk, Wilmslow, Cheshire East, SK9 5PJ

26/2986/HOUS

Proposed alteration and extension of existing integral garage.

Approved With Conditions

15 Birch Avenue, Wilmslow, Cheshire East, SK9 5JE

26/3482/HOUS

Single storey side extension.

Approved With Conditions

2 Parkway, Wilmslow, Cheshire East, SK9 1LS

26/3015/CLPUD

Certificate of lawful development for the proposed implementation of planning permission 25/2346/FUL in respect of the ground-floor planning unit known as 2A Parkway, Wilmslow, SK9 1LS only.

Withdrawn

83 Knutsford Road, Wilmslow, Cheshire East, SK9 6JH

26/2428/HOUS

Proposed single storey side extension.

Approved With Conditions

18 Macclesfield Road, Wilmslow, Cheshire East, SK9 2AA

26/1220/FUL

Erection of a 2.5-storey dwelling with associated landscaping and creation of vehicular access and driveway off Fletsand Road, in addition to the demolition of an existing garage off Macclesfield Road and erection of a replacement garage with access off Macclesfield Road.

Refused

The Planning Officer refused on the grounds that:

• The proposed development, by reason of its scale, height, massing, density, layout
  and siting within the resulting subdivision plot, would result in an overly intensive and
  cramped form of development that would fail to respond positively to the established
  spatial character of the area. The proposed dwelling, occupying an elevated position
  relative to neighbouring development and in close proximity to adjoining boundaries,
  would appear unduly prominent within the site and would erode the spacious pattern of
  development that contributes significantly to local character and distinctiveness. The
  proposal would fail to preserve the character of the garden land setting and would not
  represent a form of development that reinforces local distinctiveness.
• The proposed dwelling, by virtue of its scale, height, massing, siting and elevated position relative to No. 18 Macclesfield Road, would create an overbearing and visually intrusive form of development that would result in an unacceptable sense of enclosure, material loss of outlook and a reduction in the availability of sunlight to the private amenity areas serving that property. Taken cumulatively, these impacts would cause unacceptable harm to the living conditions of the occupiers of No. 18 Macclesfield Road and would fail to achieve an appropriate relationship with surrounding development.